Kommentarer till Why Twitter sucks (as a sales channel)

Av: Jimmy Wirsborg

Jimmy Wirsborg — Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:35:01 +0000

The argument about 140 characters seems pretty invalid. Adwords is 95 characters, although the link is excluded. So space shouldn’t be a problem for a good adwords-advertiser.

The other arguments I do buy however =)

Av: Bernice Seale

Bernice Seale — Fri, 07 May 2010 23:08:11 +0000

Great article, thank you for a terrific short read

Av: George without an "e"

George without an "e" — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:35:29 +0000

I see that you work for Omegapoint now. Isn’t Omegapoint one of ‘em allies of the Decepticons and an enemy of Optimus Prime? Will Omegapoint capture the power of the AllSpark?
Anyways, a hearty ”be well” to you from the Anti World Conspiracy Coalition Headquarters in my tin-foil lined basement in southern Malmoe, Sweden.

Av: Jens Ode

Jens Ode — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:29:59 +0000

Absolutely, there are companies that can use it with success as a sales channel. Those companies, on the other hand, most likely use it more than to just push direct sales and instead incorporate a communication or relation value in their approach. If you put a lot of care in how you build your list of followers you can successfully get through the ”spam”, however, that requires a lot of effort and an organization and a brand that is adapted for this type of communication.

Av: Jens Ode

Jens Ode — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:23:27 +0000

Thanks Scotty!

Av: Facebook Management

Facebook Management — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:05:41 +0000

Depends on the user and how they market if you can utilize niche sales approach and get through the spam u can market a certain product or service.

Av: Scotty More

Scotty More — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:14:48 +0000

Great article Jen! Why would one consider Twitter as a sales channel in the first place is my question. It’s a simple social network – plain and simple. I use it for socializing and brand leadership.

Write on!

Scotty…